Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Making Collaboration Effective


Making Collaboration Effective
The books I have referred to are
·      Building and Connecting Learning Communities: The Power of Networks for School Improvements by Steven Katz, Lorna Earl & Sonia Ben Jafar (2009)
·      Coherence: The Right Drivers in Action for Schools, Districts & Systems by Michael Fullan & Joanne Quinn (2016)
I read the these books because the authors have been involved in setting up, supporting and evaluating networks of schools in North America and the UK. The knowledge and insights they share will be useful for us as we begin working with Communities of Schools in New Zealand.

Understanding Collaboration - We need to ensure there are common understandings within a group about to embark on joint schooling improvement projects about what is meant by collaboration.

Katz, Earl & Jafar (2009, pg. 13) provide the following description of collaboration in educational networks
·      “Collaboration encompasses much more than relationships. It is intensive interaction that engages educators in opening up their beliefs and practices to investigation and debate” They describe this as a dynamic process of interpretation and evaluation of practice used to enhance personal and group learning. The process of collaboration enables people to address tough issues whilst building group understanding, mutual problem solving capacity, and spreading innovations beyond the borders of a single school site.
·      Interwoven through their notion of collaboration is the central importance of fostering inquiry habits of mind by always considering three vital questions - Where you are? Where you are going? How you will get there? In addition to responding to these questions they make the point that along the way a process of rethinking and adjustment should be used to keep the learning on track and responsive to emerging evidence.

Michael Fullan & Joanne Quinn (2016, pg. 75) make the following statement about cultivating collaborative cultures focused on improving educational outcomes for students
·      “Cultivating Collaborative Cultures – Collaborating is not just about creating a place where people feel good but rather about cultivating the expertise of everyone to be focused on collective purpose (pg. 75).”
·      They go on to stipulate that collaborative work to shift school, district & systems need to have; a strong learning design that incorporates a whole system, a focus on learning, capacity building, measureable impact, flexibility and be sustainable.

There is considerable agreement from these writers about the need for collaborative efforts aimed at improving educational outcomes both within and across schools to be focused on building relationship whilst immersed in the work of making improvements. Educationally effective collaboration goes beyond co-operation and resource sharing.

In order to move the work of networks of schools beyond comfortable spaces for sharing ideas that may not lead to deliberate inquiry into current practice and collective capacity building it is important to examine and move beyond common pitfalls. Group work can range from sporadic contacts and idiosyncratic affiliations to work of a more enduring and truly collaborative nature (Judith Warren Little, 1990 cited in Katz, Earl & Jafar, 2009).

Pitfalls masquerading as collaboration can include
·      Story telling & scanning for ideas
·      Mutual aid – help and advice: The danger here is that the advice may not be evidence based and it could dissuade teachers from more analytical investigation of effective practice.
·      Sharing: A potential snag is that the sharing may not extend to direct commentary on curriculum, learning and instruction. The practice shared may reinforce the use of current ineffective practices.
The fourth and more promising aspect of collaboration Judith Warren Little (1990, cited in Katz, Earl & Jafar, 2009) describes is Joint Work – and it includes deprivatisation and collective commitment to change. Joint work focused on challenging the status quo is a relative rarity however it is the critical core required for collaboration to change practice for the benefit of students (Katz, Earl & Jafar, 2009).  When joint work is framed as capacity building and inquiry the potential for worthwhile educational results is amplified beyond joint idea sharing approaches. Joint work can stimulate internal group accountability to finding new ways of working that will benefit students.

In conclusion here are my thoughts on collaboration
As a result of my reading the books listed above I believe that effective educational collaboration requires joint commitment to working together on an inquiry to learn and create new ways of meeting the needs of the students. Perseverance in collaborative efforts where honesty is a core relational value will be required as the group reflects on current practice that may have contributed to student underachievement. Within a network the voice of all the participants needs to be heard so that there is genuine commitment to the task and the development of expertise utilizes the group rather than just the highly vocal individuals. For such collaborations to thrive the following conditions will need to be cultivated
·      Clear identification of worthwhile shared goals based on student learning needs
·      Joint work to identify current practice (Where are we?)
·      Joint work to identify alternative effective evidence based practice (Where do we want to be?)
·      Inquiry based on the examination of current practice, new learning and evidence of the impact of new/changed practice (How are we doing?)
·      Flexibility and the recognition that agreed directions may need to change in the light of emerging evidence.
·      Developing internal accountability so there is commitment to persevering in the interest of finding best practice on behalf of the students.
·      Relational trust developed through open commitment to achievement goals based on evidence – build the relationships as we engage in the work
Thanks
Kay



5 comments:

  1. Thanks Kay, I particularly found the selection chosen from both the readings and your own understanding insightful.
    What remained in my mind was these key words-intensive,dynamic,ability to address tough issues,fostering inquiry habits by considering the three questions and deprivatisation.
    Trish

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for this Kay. I was particularly interested in the pitfalls mentioned. It is so good to have that thinking up front so you know what to avoid. One can also use it as a bit of a lens. Eg. Is my contribution just story telling, sharing or advise giving or is it joint work (Katz, Earl & Jafar, 2009). By being joint work it would focus us on challenging the status quo so as to change practice for the benefit of students . Bev

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks Kay.The idea about capacity building and inquiry resonates given it is relevant in our current work, ensuring teachers are working jointly across teams within our schools.My question I need to ask myself is how am I enabling joint work now which I can build on in my CoL work?
    Elmore (2003) also asserts the need for internal accountability "Not surprisingly, schools and school systems that do well under external accountability systems are those that have consensus on norms of instructional practice, strong internal assessments of student learning, and sturdy processes for monitoring instructional practice and for providing feedback to students, teachers, and administrators about the quality of their work". Toni

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kay I have already made a post in response to this blog however the whole blog has stuck in my mind and I have returned to it now to use the quote list below to include in one of my evaluative summaries for term 1 work in a school. It captured in a nut shell what needs to change in that particular school.
    ˆ Pitfalls masquerading as collaboration can include
    · Story telling & scanning for ideas
    · Mutual aid – help and advice: The danger here is that the advice may not be evidence based and it could dissuade teachers from more analytical investigation of effective practice.
    · Sharing: A potential snag is that the sharing may not extend to direct commentary on curriculum, learning and instruction. The practice shared may reinforce the use of current ineffective practices.
    The fourth and more promising aspect of collaboration Judith Warren Little (1990, cited in Katz, Earl & Jafar, 2009) describes is Joint Work – and it includes deprivatisation and collective commitment to change. Joint work focused on challenging the status quo is a relative rarity however it is the critical core required for collaboration to change practice for the benefit of students (Katz, Earl & Jafar, 2009). When joint work is framed as capacity building and inquiry the potential for worthwhile educational results is amplified beyond joint idea sharing approaches. Joint work can stimulate internal group accountability to finding new ways of working that will benefit students.

    Thank you so much Bev

    ReplyDelete
  5. As quoted above by you Kay Joint Work including deprivatisation and collective commitment to change, focused on challenging the status quo is a relative rarity however it is the critical core required for collaboration to change practice for the benefit of students (Katz, Earl & Jafar, 2009). When joint work is framed as capacity building and inquiry the potential for worthwhile educational results is amplified beyond joint idea sharing approaches. Joint work can stimulate internal group accountability to finding new ways of working that will benefit students"
    I can see how well this fits with solution focused coaching as proffered or posited by Kylie Hammond and Julie Starr where the focus is on inquiry to solve the way forward. However I also see it worthwhile for me to frame my work more explicitly as capacity building in order for my learners to take more accountability for their results. Thanks Kay

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.